I have just had an epiphany of biblical proportions:
Fixed-width websites suck.
Okay, so it's not a huge revelation, but still, I was quite proud of myself. Why is it that website designers think they know how large I want their website to appear on my screen? I have two 20" monitors, and many websites show content in less than half of my browser window.
Any decent website would have a template that showed content at whatever resolution the viewer wanted.
That's why there'll be some changes around here. I'm going to try and design my own blogger template, or at least rip of someone else's good work and call it my own.
Round one of changes has been completed. The new theme is based on the stretch-denim blogspot theme, with a few revisions of my own.
I have just had an epiphany of biblical proportions:
I looked at three different virtualisation projects: bochs, QEMU, and VirtualBox. Of the three, virtualbox really stands out. It's a commercial product that is also released as open source software, and it really shows. The user interface is very similar to Microsoft virtual PC, possibly even a bit better.
It's been a long time since I tried running any virtualisation software under Linux, and I'm pleasantly surprised at the results.
It seems that interesting blog posts come in berths. I wanted to take this opportunity to comment on a few interesting ones I've seen around recently:
Aaron Seigo on Multiscreen X
This is a topic I've been fretting about for a long time - why can't we get multi-screen support done properly? My personal theory is that since we've had multiple virtual desktops for a long time, there has been less need for solid multi-screen support.
The panel problems that Aaron mentions really don't bother me that much. What I really want is a few more window management buttons - for example, one that allows me to move a window to the second monitor, and back again.
Jeff Atwood on Extensions
Jeff argues that many of the extensions currently provided for in firefox should be shipped by default. I can see where he's coming from, but at the same time you must realize that firefox started life as a slimmed down version of the older Mozilla browser. I can remember the days when switching to firefox meant having to wait 10 seconds for the browser to load, instead of 20-30.
Several of the user-comments on that page are very insightful. One chap mentions that perhaps we need a better way of browsing extensions, and grouping extensions together. Also, perhaps we need a firefox installation package that provides a core set of extensions pre-installed?
Of course, we don't want to get back to the mozilla days, so I can understand why firefox is shipped sans extensions.
Well, Easter is here - the first holiday I've had since my New Zealand trip. Should be good fun, except the weather promises to be bad.
I enjoy working with open source software - I guess that comes as no surprise to those of you who know me. There are many reasons why I'm drawn to the open source model, including the following:
- I like making stuff, and have the skills to do so - It's getting easier too. Application developers are realizing that making it easy for their users to extend and customize their products can only be a good thing. KDE 4.0 does this very well - you can write many simple KDE extensions in a language of your choice. Of course there are more ways to extend an application than by programming - but that's hat I'm good at.
- Most of the time, I enjoy the community. Like any community, there are always going to be your garden variety blockheads, who seem to live for the sole purpose of making every one else's lives difficult. The open nature of an open source community makes it harder to deal with these people, but I guess that's the price you pay for freedom. On the other hand, where else can you mingle with thousands of industry experts for free? It's like being at a huge tech conference twenty four hours a day for free!
- Open != unprofitable. Many open source projects have gone on to be the basis for a successful business model. Sure, it's harder to make truck loads of cash by treating your customers poorly, but it is possible to grow a successful business by releasing open source software. The list of companies is huge - Trolltech springs to mind - they've just been bought by Nokia for some vast sum of money, so they must be doing something right.
- Finally, I enjoy the fact that there are no boundaries. If you have an idea for a piece of software, you can make it. There are no closed protocols to get in the way, there are no commercial pressures forcing you to take shortcuts; you are free to write your software as you wish. If you feel that writing a product that consumes massive amounts of memory and randomly crashes is a good idea - go ahead. The measure of success will be how many users use your software.
Another point here is that this openness and strong competition leads to some very careful planning of software features. Take KDE 4 for example. Some very intelligent people have sat down together and thought about the best new features they need to make KDE even better. Don't believe me? See Aaron Seigio's KDE4 release keynote speech; it'll knock your socks off.
Working as a volunteer on an open source project takes skill, commitment and determination. There are very few external motivating factors. If the project you're working on doesn't interest you, chances are you won't complete the work. The reward at the end of the tunnel is the gratitude of your fellow developers and users; not to mention some new skills you can take to your next project.
I've been involved in open source software for the last 10 years in one way or another. In that time I've picked up many skills that I can be proud of. Unfortunately, in my professional life, these skills aren't recognized by my peers - and understandably so. I have no formal qualification in the subject area, they've never seen me apply my skills in a practical manner, there may even be a lack of understanding that it's possible to gain new skills outside professional development or formal qualifications.
Which brings me to the point of this post. I want the open attitudes of the open source world to migrate to the commercial software development world. I want to have an "anything is possible" attitude towards our commercial products. We've already seen time and time again how products that started out as garden-shed projects with this open attitude have merged into multi-billion dollar products. Why can't we replicate that in a real business?
Obviously these Utopian ideals need to be tempered with the reality of running a business, but I refuse to believe that the two trains of thought are mutually exclusive. I encourage any of the readers of this blog to try to develop an "anything is possible" attitude towards product development. If you set your mind to achieve greatness, it'll happen. Why settle for anything less?
I realize that this may sound a little naive - but that's the whole point. Naivety isn't something to be ashamed of, that idealism is what makes us great; our ability to see the world as it should be, and strive to meet that distant goal is (as far as I'm concerned) fundamental to what makes us human.
In an effort to avoid work, I started searching the internet for new sources of entertainment. I stumbled upon Best Tech videos.
There are many many videos for your enjoyment, covering a wide range of topics. Since the OnSoftware Podcast series seems to be slowing, this should keep me amused for a while longer!